Proposal for Faculty/Librarian Information Literacy Project

Faculty: Margaret Gehring, Nancy Knop from Department of Physical Education
Librarian: Joy He, Beeghly Public Services Librarian

Proposal Overview

This proposal describes a continuation of the 4-tiered project to promote information literacy throughout the physical education major that our department started last year. Two classes in the major were not amended last year -one because it was not offered and one because the faculty member did not buy into the literacy proposal. Another class was amended (PE 374) but the focus of that course is being changed this year. The focus of this proposed project is to reconstruct these three courses to be consistent with the departmental literacy goal of embedding and supporting strong information literacy components within the current course pedagogies. It will include instruction in the classroom and class tasks, some of which will be supported by Web-based examples and tutorials, and sessions in the library and computer lab. These courses and the information literacy initiatives will also be supported by E-Res.

The primary focus of the proposal is to create tasks that allow students to actively engage in the course content using emerging and newly developed information literacy skills. These tasks will address student understanding of how, for example, different political and social issues impact sport and the perception of sport in our society and the reverse - how sport influences our perceptions of our society. Students will engage in tasks designed to teach them how to find and evaluate the information that is found. Further, these courses will guide students to critically analyze related course content by creating a written and verbal presentation that convincingly documents sides of an issue and supports an argument for action. The presentation tasks are more terminal projects and will be created through a series of smaller tasks designed to give students feedback and guidance on the process of researching and communicating their findings in a meaningful way. This will be a primary focus of this project since these courses are usually taken later in the student's career in the physical education major. A further purpose of this proposed project is to model good, dynamic information literacy based education to future professionals so they will have templates in their minds of what good instruction of this content should look like. A final purpose is to create a fun, dynamic, challenging courses that are composed of a synchronous weave of information literacy and content concepts specific to our discipline.

While this grant is proposed for Physical Education major courses, we hope to make the information literacy skill support materials created for these courses available to all physical education faculty and students via links on our departmental WWW pages. Further, all materials, links, strategies, and tasks supporting the information literacy project within the health class will be created as support pages on a virtual physical education information literacy course on E-Res. In this way, once the information literacy project is over the results will continue to exist and be amended to encourage continued information literacy skill development within the physical education and health curriculum.

All courses proposed in this project are Tier 3 courses. The following information literacy goals were determined this past year for Tier 3 courses and include: continued use of E-Res applications, application and critique of discipline specific hard copy and online resources, ability to transfer knowledge into original questions to support further research, and ability to communicate these findings in a verbal and written form.

Timeline for the Project

  1. Determine a priority of information literacy skills that will best enhance information literacy and content learning across student's experiences in the major via these three courses.
  2. Determine information literacy-to-content relationships for each course in this project to create best fit for what information literacy skills appropriate in each course.
  3. Examine individual course content to determine how to best weave meaningful information literacy issues throughout them.
  4. Determine delivery methods (teaching, activities, projects, and support) appropriate for learning/applying information literacy skills in each course.
  5. Design information literacy skills appropriate for each course.
  6. Design accountability system to support information literacy skills and content learning in each course.
  7. Design a programmatic assessment plan to evaluate student information literacy learning in each course and across the major.

Phase 1 -Summer 2002

  1. Predict which information literacy issues will be most important for each class.
  2. Meet 1-2 times with librarian to brainstorm information literacy issues and how to pedagogically weave them into course content.

Phase 2 - Fall 2002

  1. Teach fall courses in the project with the support of library liaison.
    1. Conduct regular meetings with individual instructor and library liaison to discuss and document changes for remaining semester.
    2. Document these needed changes so changes will be made for subsequent semesters.

Phase 3 - Early and Late Fall 2002

  1. Pre-testing of students' information literacy knowledge using survey generated for each tier of courses.
  2. Embed several information literacy-based but content specific questions in all course tests.
  3. Post-testing of students' information literacy knowledge (tier survey).
  4. Conduct focus group interviews of representative sample from each course to get student perspective on the information literacy skills embedded in the course.

Phase 4 - End of fall semester

  1. Review changes for course taught in spring semester.
  2. Reflect on fall courses and student feedback to fall courses.
  3. Make edits to support pages and individual course syllabi and supporting materials.

Phase 5 - Spring 2003

  1. Teach spring course in the project with the support of library liaison.
    1. Conduct regular meetings with individual instructor and library liaison to discuss and document changes for remaining semester.
    2. Document these needed changes so changes will be made for subsequent semesters.

Phase 6 - Early and Late Spring, 2003

  1. Pre-testing of students' information literacy knowledge using survey generated for each tier of courses.
  2. Embed several information literacy-based but content specific questions in all course tests.
  3. Post-testing of students' information literacy knowledge (tier survey).
  4. Conduct focus group interviews of representative sample from each course to get student perspective on the information literacy skills embedded in the course.

Phase 7 - End of spring semester

  1. Review changes for course taught in spring semester.
  2. Reflect on fall courses and student feedback to fall courses.
  3. Make edits to support pages and individual course syllabi and supporting materials.

Estimated amount of time for faculty member

Phase 1: (early summer, 2002): _5 hrs X 2 faculty/staff= 10 hrs

Phase 2: (fall, 2002) _10 hrs X 2 faculty/staff= 20 hours

Phase 3: (fall, 2002 ) _ 5 hrs X 2 faculty/staff= 10 hours

Phase 4: (end of semester)_ 5_hrs X 2 faculty = 10 hours

Phase 5: (end of fall/spring, 2003 ) 5_hrs X 1 faculty/staff= 5 hours

Phase 6 (Spring 2003) 5_hrs X 1 faculty/staff= 5 hours

Phase 7 (End of Spring 2003) 5_hrs X 1 faculty/staff= 5 hours

Total hours = 65 hours

Specific goals for task construction that will allow active learning

Some of the goals for information literacy that will be embedded and weaved into many of the other physical education major's courses are listed below with some specific examples of topics for the tasks.

Goals

  1. Identify different types of resources to find relevant info. (i.e. finding and evaluating health or fitness assessment instruments, for example: BMI, skinfold, underwater body fat testing, Waist/Hip ratio or determining how to assess people - practices, protocols).
  2. Know when to use each type of resource (i.e., obtaining info on very specialized methods for example, why use BMI - why is it so frequently used?).
  3. Find resources using various tools - online catalogue and search engines. For example, learning and using advanced search techniques and make use of on-line journals
  4. Evaluate sources of information (books, journals, WWW, popular media sources), for example how to integrate different types of resources in writing a research paper (when are peer reviewed articles used, when are popular media articles appropriate?).
  5. Understand how to effectively make an argument incorporating evidence obtained through library research. For example, write a clear and compelling argument while appropriately bringing in relevant evidence or delivering a clear and compelling argument in speech - forum, roundtable, panel, deliver a lesson to high school students.
  6. Appropriately using citations in writing and speaking
  7. Locating and evaluating www sites on health topics
  8. Choosing topics for papers, how to begin research

Strengths of this Approach to Information Literacy Instruction.

The proposed system of instruction for physical education and health students has several advantages over the current system of instruction.

  1. The several phases of the project allows time for both the instructor and librarian to reflect on what was learned in the attempt to embed information literacy into the course. Following that changes based on what was learned can be made to ensure success of the project.
  2. The use of ERES pages to support information literacy with the course offers an asynchronous method of supporting student learning of both the information literacy and content issues. These further support the deep embedding of information literacy issues within the course after the project is over.
  3. Team planning and teaching of the information literacy embedded course content by the librarian and instructor should provide a more seamless integration of information literacy into the course. It will allow better support for students as they leave the class and enter the library. It will also allow for better construction and communication of class tasks and uses of campus and CONSORT resources.
  4. Each of the embedded information literacy class tasks will allow students to practice information literacy skills with the content immediately after the information literacy skill is addressed. Further, many of the information literacy tasks will build on each other allowing students multiple opportunities for practice, critique, and feedback on their decisions.
  5. Several times in the semester, students will complete tasks, which guide them to evaluate, organize, and integrate information from a number of sources. From here students will be asked to communicate verbally and in written form both the process of finding and weighing the value of the information and what was learned from it.

Return to top

Return to list of proposals